CT Summation, a premier supplier of litigation support and eDiscovery solutions (EDD), today announced the availability CT Summation Enterprise 2.6. The company's SQL based litigation solution provides legal professionals with new workflow functionality and technology enhancements that provide significant ease of use and performance improvements.
CT Summation Delivers New Features and Web-Based eDiscovery Efficiencies
December 01, 2008
|
|
CT Summation, a premier supplier of litigation support and eDiscovery solutions (EDD), today announced the availability CT Summation Enterprise 2.6. The company's SQL based litigation solution provides legal professionals with new workflow functionality and technology enhancements that provide significant ease of use and performance improvements.
CT Summation Enterprise combines the award-winning technology and time-tested functionality of the integrated CT Summation iBlaze and CT Summation WebBlaze litigation solutions with the scalability of a Microsoft® SQL Server database to master the massive amounts of information generated by today's voluminous cases. CT Summation Enterprise gives you the power to collaborate via your network or the Web, meet deadlines and litigate large cases with confidence. Enterprise has the same familiar look, feel, and integrated workflow of CT Summation iBlaze; however, CT Summation Enterprise offers new features for managing mega-cases, including enhanced tools for volume document coding, improved production tools and field-level security.
CT Summation Enterprise 2.6 benefits include: - Tag and Folder Documents: Provide users with a quick means of identification and categorization of case documents as well as simplified organization of documents. This feature, an extremely popular iBlaze mainstay, is now enhanced within Enterprise 2.6.
- Easily Split Images: Divide one image document into two with a simple click. This workflow feature enables the splitting of batch scans and voluminous documents into separate documents improving ease of use and reviewer efficiency.
- Work efficiently with Global Replace: Insert words or phrases before or after selected information. Strategically replace text and document coding. Move entire columns of information to an alternate field. Global Replace lowers administrative overhead with an innovative user interface and added functionality.
- Enhance performance with CopyCase to Mobile: Copy case information to your laptop and take it with you. Transfer data up to 40 percent faster. Users are not always connected to the network, so when working remotely, they can now CopyCase to Mobile with greater ease.
- WebBlaze enhancements: Load transcripts remotely. Edit documents summaries directly from the grid view. Toggle between multiple views using tabs. Choose to "dock or float" windows anywhere on your screen. Breeze through documents up to 30 percent faster. The new WebBlaze significantly boosts remote access and productivity.
- "We are very excited to provide legal professionals with CT Summation Enterprise 2.6 and its client-driven features and performance enhancements," said Tom Rump, vice president of litigation solutions for Wolters Kluwer Corporate Legal Services. "This latest release builds on the robust data management provided by the SQL server as well as our remote litigation support solution. We continue to provide legal professionals with the comprehensive solutions needed in today's tough litigation environment."
|
Testimonials
"Nothing else has the features and functionality of AD Summation. iBlaze has the ability to cull 100,000 documents to what is responsive to an issue. We have attorneys on the road taking depositions around the United States, for sometimes up to two months. They are able to take more then 50,000 documents with them and prepare for the next deposition using AD Summation."
Whitney Summers, Burr Forman LLP
Case Studies
Today law firms are challenged like never before when faced with mega-sized cases involving millions of documents and millions of dollars. A multi-million document litigation will saddle a law firm with difficult technology decisions and staffing concerns. How does a law firm involved in a mega-sized case evaluate their document review options and determine the right database technology choice?
|